Free Resources / Writing Sample Answers

Cambridge 17 Writing Task 2 Test 4 - Sample Answers (Band 9 to 4-5)

Real band 9, 8, 7 and 6.5 sample answers for this prompt, plus a genuine band 4-5 answer so you can see exactly what pulls a score down. Every sample comes with examiner-style notes on Task Response, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range & Accuracy.

The Prompt

Alternative Medicine

Nowadays, a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor.

Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

Want feedback like this on your own writing?

Sign up free →

Band 9

291 words

Draws a clear, well-supported distinction between alternative medicine as a replacement versus a complement to conventional care.

An increasing number of people are turning to alternative medicine instead of conventional medical treatment, and while this trend is understandable given people's frustration with modern healthcare systems, I believe it is, on balance, a negative development when alternative treatments replace rather than complement evidence-based medicine.

There are genuine reasons why people are drawn to alternative medicine. Many feel that conventional doctors, particularly in overstretched public healthcare systems, spend too little time with each patient and treat symptoms rather than underlying causes, whereas alternative practitioners often offer longer consultations and a more holistic, personalised approach that many patients find genuinely reassuring and empowering.

However, I believe the risks of this trend generally outweigh its benefits, particularly for serious conditions. Unlike conventional medicine, most alternative treatments have not been rigorously tested in controlled clinical trials, meaning their effectiveness is often unproven or, in some cases, has been directly disproven. A well-documented danger arises when patients with serious illnesses such as cancer delay or abandon effective conventional treatment in favour of unproven alternatives, sometimes with fatal consequences that could have been avoided through timely medical intervention.

That said, alternative medicine is not entirely without merit for minor or chronic conditions where conventional medicine offers limited relief, such as certain forms of chronic pain, and many people successfully use it alongside, rather than instead of, their doctor's advice. In these complementary cases, the psychological benefit of feeling more in control of one's own health can be genuinely valuable.

In conclusion, while I understand why people seek alternative medicine given legitimate frustrations with conventional healthcare, I believe this shift is largely negative whenever it replaces properly tested treatment for serious conditions, though it can be a reasonable complement to conventional care in less severe cases.

Examiner Notes

Task Response: Gives a clear, well-supported opinion with a specific real-world danger (delaying cancer treatment) and a genuine, balanced acknowledgement of when alternative medicine can be appropriate.

Coherence & Cohesion: Ideas progress logically from reasons to risks to a balanced counterpoint, with cohesive devices ("however", "that said") managing each shift smoothly.

Lexical Resource: Wide range of precise vocabulary ("evidence-based", "rigorously tested", "complementary") used with natural collocation throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Wide range of complex structures, including concession clauses, used with full accuracy.

Band 8

256 words

Clearly argued with a relevant example, just slightly more general in its supporting detail than a band 9 answer.

More people nowadays are trying alternative medicine instead of seeing their usual doctor, and I believe this is mostly a negative development, especially when it replaces proven medical treatment.

There are understandable reasons for this trend. Many people feel that doctors, especially in busy public healthcare systems, do not spend enough time with each patient, whereas alternative practitioners often offer longer, more personal consultations that make patients feel more cared for.

However, I think this trend is mostly negative, particularly for serious illnesses. Most alternative treatments have not been properly tested in scientific studies, so we cannot be sure they actually work. A serious danger is when people with illnesses such as cancer delay proper medical treatment in favour of unproven alternatives, which can sometimes be fatal.

That said, alternative medicine can be helpful for minor problems, such as certain types of chronic pain, especially when it is used alongside a doctor's advice rather than instead of it. In these cases, it can make people feel more in control of their own health.

In conclusion, while I understand why people try alternative medicine, I believe it is mostly a negative development when it replaces proper medical treatment for serious conditions, though it can be a reasonable addition to conventional care for less serious problems. Governments and health authorities could help by requiring alternative treatments to be tested more rigorously before being marketed, so that patients can make genuinely informed decisions rather than relying on anecdotal claims that may not reflect how effective a treatment truly is.

Examiner Notes

Task Response: Gives a clear opinion with a relevant example and a fair counterpoint, though the reasoning is slightly more general than the band 9 answer's.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clear five-paragraph structure with accurate cohesive devices throughout.

Lexical Resource: Good range of vocabulary, though "mostly negative" is repeated more than the higher-band answer's varied phrasing.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Mostly accurate complex sentences with only rare minor slips.

Band 7

258 words

A clear, well-reasoned opinion that would be stronger with the cancer-treatment danger developed further.

Nowadays, more people are trying alternative medicine instead of going to their usual doctor. I think this is mostly a negative development.

One reason people do this is that doctors are often very busy and do not spend much time with each patient, while alternative practitioners often spend more time listening to patients.

However, I think this is negative because many alternative treatments have not been tested properly, so we do not know if they really work. This can be dangerous, especially for serious illnesses like cancer, where people might delay proper treatment and this can be very harmful.

On the other hand, alternative medicine can be useful for small problems, like mild pain, especially if it is used together with a doctor's advice.

In conclusion, I believe trying alternative medicine instead of seeing a doctor is mostly negative, especially for serious illnesses, but it can be helpful for minor problems if used carefully. Doctors and alternative practitioners could also work together more closely, so that patients are not forced to choose one approach over the other completely. For example, a patient could continue receiving proper medical treatment for a serious illness while also trying a complementary alternative therapy to help manage stress or discomfort alongside it, rather than replacing their doctor's advice entirely. This kind of combined approach would allow patients to benefit from the personal attention that alternative practitioners often offer, while still receiving treatment that has actually been proven to work through proper scientific testing, rather than having to choose between the two approaches entirely.

Examiner Notes

Task Response: Gives a clear opinion with relevant reasoning, but the cancer-treatment example is not developed in as much depth as in the higher-band answers.

Coherence & Cohesion: Organised logically with reasons, opinion, and counterpoint in separate paragraphs; cohesive devices ("However", "On the other hand") are accurate but predictable.

Lexical Resource: Adequate range for the task, with some repetition of "negative" and "treatment" throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Generally accurate mix of simple and complex sentences; meaning is always clear.

Band 6.5

256 words

The opinion and reasoning are both clear, but agreement errors appear in almost every sentence.

Nowadays, more people is trying alternative medicine instead of going to their usual doctor. I think this is mostly negative development.

One reason people do this is that doctor is often very busy and do not spend much time with each patient, while alternative practitioner often spend more time listening to patient.

However, I think this is negative because many alternative treatment has not been test properly, so we do not know if they really work. This can be dangerous, especially for serious illness like cancer, where people might delay proper treatment and this can be very harmful.

On the other hand, alternative medicine can be useful for small problem, like mild pain, especially if it is use together with a doctor advice.

In conclusion, I believe trying alternative medicine instead of seeing doctor is mostly negative, especially for serious illness, but it can be helpful for minor problem if use carefully. Doctor and alternative practitioner could also work together more closely, so that patient is not force to choose one approach over the other completely. For example, a patient could continue receiving proper medical treatment for a serious illness while also trying a complementary alternative therapy to help manage stress or discomfort alongside it, rather than replacing their doctor advice entirely. This kind of combined approach would allow patient to benefit from the personal attention that alternative practitioner often offer, while still receiving treatment that has actually been prove to work through proper scientific testing, rather than having to choose between the two approach entirely.

Examiner Notes

Task Response: Gives a clear opinion with relevant reasoning, matching the content of the band 7 answer, but grammar errors throughout reduce clarity.

Coherence & Cohesion: Follows the same five-part structure as the higher-band answers.

Lexical Resource: Limited by missing plurals on key task words ("doctor", "patient", "treatment") used throughout instead of their plural forms.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent subject-verb agreement errors ("more people is trying", "doctor is often very busy", "treatment has not been test") appear on nearly every sentence.

Band 4-5 - What to Avoid

31 words

States an opinion but never develops it with any evidence or example, and stays well under the required length.

I think alternative medicine is risky.

Doctor is trained but some alternative thing is not tested, this can be dangerous.

I prefer normal doctor, this is my opinion about this topic.

Examiner Notes

Task Response: States an opinion but gives only a single unsupported sentence with no real-world example or development of the argument. At well under 250 words, the response is also underlength.

Coherence & Cohesion: Reads as short, disconnected statements with minimal linking.

Lexical Resource: Vocabulary is basic and repetitive ("think", "risky", "dangerous") with little variation.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent errors throughout ("doctor is trained", "I prefer normal doctor").

Practise this exact prompt yourself, with a live timer and word count

Free to sign up, no credit card required.

Sign Up Free →

These sample answers are written independently for Prep IELTS Now to illustrate real band-score differences. They are a study aid, not official Cambridge or IELTS material.