Free Resources / Writing Sample Answers

Cambridge 11 Writing Task 1 Test 2 - Sample Answers (Band 9 to 4-5)

Real band 9, 8, 7 and 6.5 sample answers for this prompt, plus a genuine band 4-5 answer so you can see exactly what pulls a score down. Every sample comes with examiner-style notes on Task Achievement, Coherence & Cohesion, Lexical Resource and Grammatical Range & Accuracy.

The Prompt

British Students Speaking Other Languages

The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Write at least 150 words.

The Data

British students speaking other languages, 2000

No other language: 30%

French only: 20%

Two other languages: 15%

Another language: 15%

German only: 10%

Spanish only: 10%

British students speaking other languages, 2010

No other language: 35%

French only: 20%

Two other languages: 15%

German only: 10%

Spanish only: 10%

Another language: 10%

Want feedback like this on your own writing?

Sign up free →

Band 9

178 words

Separates the two categories that actually changed from the four that stayed flat, rather than reporting all six as equally significant.

The two pie charts compare the proportion of British students at one English university who could speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.

Overall, the proportion of students speaking no additional language increased over the decade, while the proportion able to speak a language other than French, German or Spanish declined, with the other categories remaining largely stable.

In 2000, 30% of students spoke no other language, a figure that rose to 35% by 2010, making this the single largest category in both years and the only one to grow. French was the most common additional language throughout, holding steady at 20% in both years, and the proportion able to speak two other languages also remained unchanged at 15%.

The clearest decline was in the "another language" category, which fell from 15% in 2000 to just 10% in 2010, dropping below German and Spanish, both of which stayed constant at 10% across the decade. This suggests that fewer students were learning languages beyond the four most common options by the end of the period.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Covers all six categories across both years with a precise overview identifying the two genuine changes (rising monolingualism, declining "another language" share) against an otherwise stable picture.

Coherence & Cohesion: A clear overview precedes detail organised by category, with cohesive devices ("while", "this suggests") linking the two years naturally.

Lexical Resource: Precise, varied language ("held steady", "remained largely stable", "the clearest decline") used accurately throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Wide range of accurate structures, including passive voice and comparatives, used with full control.

Band 8

155 words

Accurate and clearly organised, just relying on the same comparative phrase slightly more often than ideal.

The two pie charts show what proportion of British students at one university could speak other languages besides English, comparing the years 2000 and 2010.

Overall, more students spoke no other language in 2010 than in 2000, while the proportion who spoke a language in the "another language" category fell, and most of the other categories stayed the same.

In 2000, 30% of students spoke no additional language, and this increased to 35% in 2010, making it the largest group in both years. French remained the most common additional language, at 20% in both years, and speaking two other languages also stayed the same, at 15%.

The "another language" category dropped from 15% to 10% over the decade, while German and Spanish stayed exactly the same, at 10% each, in both years. This means that by 2010, French, German and Spanish together made up a larger share of language ability than less common languages did.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Covers all six categories accurately with a clear overview, though the closing generalisation about French, German and Spanish's combined share is a slightly less central observation than the band 9 answer's overall framing.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised with an overview followed by year-by-year detail; cohesive devices are accurate throughout.

Lexical Resource: Good range of vocabulary for comparison, though "stayed the same" is repeated more often than in a higher-band answer.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Accurate throughout, with a good mix of simple and complex sentence structures.

Band 7

165 words

All figures are correct, but the same comparative phrase is repeated where more variety would help.

The charts give information about British students at one university and whether they could speak other languages apart from English, in 2000 and 2010.

Overall, the number of students who could not speak any other language went up between 2000 and 2010, and one category, "another language", went down, while the rest of the categories did not change much.

In 2000, 30% of students spoke no other language, and this number became 35% in 2010, which was the biggest group in both years. French stayed the same at 20% in both years, and two other languages also stayed the same at 15%.

German and Spanish both stayed at 10% in both years, but "another language" went down from 15% to 10%. This shows that most students' language ability did not change much over the ten years, except for a small increase in students speaking no other language at all. Overall, the data suggests that language ability among these students stayed fairly consistent across the decade.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports all six categories accurately with a basic overview, but the overview is a fairly plain restatement of the two changes rather than a genuinely analytical summary.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by year, though "stayed the same" is repeated three times across the paragraphs.

Lexical Resource: Adequate range for the task; figures are accurate but connecting language is fairly plain throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Generally accurate, mostly simple sentence structures; meaning is always clear.

Band 6.5

156 words

The figures are all correct, but agreement errors appear in almost every sentence.

The chart give information about British student at one university and if they can speak other language apart from English, in 2000 and 2010.

Overall, the number of student who cannot speak any other language go up between 2000 and 2010, and one category, another language, go down, while rest of category not change much.

In 2000, 30% of student speak no other language, and this number become 35% in 2010, which is biggest group in both year. French stay same at 20% in both year, and two other language also stay same at 15%.

German and Spanish both stay at 10% in both year, but another language go down from 15% to 10%. This show that most student language ability not change much over the ten year, except for small increase in student speaking no other language at all. Overall, the data show that language ability among these student stay fairly consistent across the decade.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: Reports all six categories accurately with a basic overview naming the two changes, matching the content of the band 7 answer.

Coherence & Cohesion: Clearly organised by year, following the same structure as the higher-band answers.

Lexical Resource: Limited by "student", "language" and "category" being used without their plural forms throughout.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent subject-verb agreement errors ("chart give", "number of student... go up", "category... go down", "student speak", "French stay same") appear in nearly every sentence.

Band 4-5 - What to Avoid

57 words

Half the categories are missing entirely, no figures are given anywhere, and it closes with a personal opinion.

This chart show language ability of student in 2000 and 2010. Most student can speak French, this is popular language.

Some student cannot speak any language, this number go up in 2010.

Other language go down a little, this is interesting because I think more people should learn language today, it is very useful skill for job.

Examiner Notes

Task Achievement: German, Spanish and "two other languages" are not mentioned at all, no exact figures are given for any category, and the closing comment about language skills being useful for jobs is a personal opinion with no place in a Task 1 report. At well under 150 words, the response is also underlength.

Coherence & Cohesion: Reads as three short, disconnected remarks rather than an organised comparison between the two years.

Lexical Resource: Vague and repetitive vocabulary ("student", "language") used instead of the specific category names and figures given in the charts.

Grammatical Range & Accuracy: Frequent errors throughout ("chart show", "Most student can speak", "Some student cannot speak", "this number go up").

Practise this exact prompt yourself, with a live timer and word count

Free to sign up, no credit card required.

Sign Up Free →

These sample answers are written independently for Prep IELTS Now to illustrate real band-score differences. They are a study aid, not official Cambridge or IELTS material.